"You're right that the effective number of parameters in a regression or classification tree goes beyond simply counting the nodes. The complexity of the tree, including its structure and the selection of variables at each split, plays a significant role in determining the model's effective capacity.
1. Formal Mathematical Frameworks
One formal approach to quantify the effective number of parameters is through degrees of freedom (DoF), which takes into account the tree structure. The idea is to estimate the complexity by considering not just the number of parameters (like split points and terminal nodes) but also how flexible the model is in fitting the data. However, calculating DoF for decision trees isn't straightforward due to their non-linear, non-parametric nature. Some approaches involve:
- Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) or Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC): These criteria penalize models with more parameters. Although designed for linear models, they can be adapted to trees by considering the number of splits as part of the penalty term.
- Vapnik-Chervonenkis (VC) Dimension: The VC dimension provides a theoretical upper bound on the model's capacity to fit a variety of functions. For trees, the VC dimension is related to the maximum depth and number of leaves.
2. Heuristics for Effective Parameters
Given the difficulty of formalizing the effective number of parameters, some heuristics have been proposed:
- Number of Leaves (Terminal Nodes): This is a common heuristic where each leaf is treated as an independent parameter. However, this doesn't account for the tree's structure.
- Tree Depth: Some heuristics multiply the number of leaves by a factor related to the tree depth, recognizing that deeper trees have more complexity.
- Effective Number of Parameters (ENP): A heuristic suggested in some statistical literature is ENP=α×Number of Leaves, where α is a factor that accounts for the structure of the tree (e.g., α=1.5 or 2.0 as a rough estimate).
3. Effective Degrees of Freedom:
A practical approximation might be to treat the Effective Degrees of Freedom (EDF) as the number of leaves plus a penalty for tree depth. One possible formula could be:
EDF=Number of Leaves+β×Tree Depth
where β is a chosen constant that reflects the additional complexity introduced by deeper trees.
These approaches recognize that the effective number of parameters in a tree is a combination of the number of decision rules (nodes), the depth (which controls the flexibility), and the tree's overall structure. While these are not strict mathematical formulas, they provide useful guidelines for estimating the complexity of a decision tree model in practice."